When an aircraft crashes and causes personal
injury or death, it is often difficult to determine the exact
cause of the accident. Was it pilot error? Did the aircraft
malfunction? Was there negligence on the owner’s part? Ho well was the
pilot trained? Was the aircraft being flown in a way it wasn’t intended
to fly? Were the crew and passengers aware of how to act in an
emergency?
In virtually any instance where a plane crashes,
someone is liable. Whether it is the operator’s error, the owner’s poor
judgment or a defective
part on the aircraft, there are almost always steps which
could have been taken to prevent the accident. Determining which
individual is liable, or if it is a combination of issues must be
determined before restitution can be awarded.
Aircraft Failure
Aircraft failure causes can be broken into several
categories:
- Poor design
- Poor manufacturing practices
- Poor maintenance
Any of these may cause the failure of an aircraft
part to operate, loosening of parts due to vibration, or lack of
crashworthiness.
Manufacturer Fault
The manufacturer of an aircraft may be at fault in
several different ways. However, for a manufacturer to be liable, the
craft must have a design defect or manufacturing defect. This can
include the manufacturer’s failure to warn or inadequate warnings about
known issues, or incorrect emergency instructions, as well as
incorrectly manufactured or assembled parts or the inability of parts
to respond as expected.
To prove a design defect, the plaintiff must be
able to prove that the product line is deficient in the same area
across each craft of that model. A manufacturing defect may only have
affected one of the aircraft or may affect them all, through incorrect
assembly, substandard materials, and so on.
Operator Failure
To successfully sue for operator failure, the
operator must be proved negligent, or to have acted in a negligent
manner. This can include:
- Loss of control
- Inadequate training
- Misuse of aircraft or part of aircraft
- Failure to react in a timely manner
- Decision to fly in dangerous weather
Owner Failure
In some cases, it is the owner and not the
operator or manufacturer who may be held responsible. An owner may
exercise negligence through:
- Exercising use of the craft despite known
inadequacies
- Use despite known damage or danger
- Failure of the aircraft to be inspected
- Modifications or alterations to the craft
- Failure to repair damage to the craft
Types of Damages
Aviation liability may be sought for damage to an
individual or property on an aircraft, or damage to property caused by
crashes or emergency landings.
Assumption of Risk
Assumption of risk is a term referring to the
victim clear understanding of the risk involved in partaking in an
activity, such as in sky diving. If, for example, a client chartered a
private jet and was recommended to delay departure due to inclement
weather, but insisted on taking the risk despite the recommendation,
the client may not be able to successfully sue for injury or damages.
In many cases, aviation accidents are caused by
multiple faults, such as pilot causing a crash, but manufacturer’s poor
design causing fire and disfigurement. In this type of example, the
pilot alone would not be solely held responsible for an accident.
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/
aviation-liability-1073052.html About the Author
The website of the experienced aviation
liability attorneys at The Cochran Firm
can provide answers to many of your question, and provides the
locations of offices nationwide. |